MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE JURY AWARDS 2013 AVS BEST PRACTICES IN A PROTECTED HOUSING

In Madrid on February 12, 2014, at 11 pm in the meeting room of the Green Building Council Spain (GBCe), located in Madrid, Paseo de la Castellana 114-4º-7 members meet Jury Awards 2013 AVS best practices in subsidized housing on the invitation would regulate.

Attending the meeting members of the jury, which are:

• D. Francisco Javier Martín Ramiro, Deputy Director General of Architecture and Building. Ministry of Development

• Julio Tejedor Bielsa, Professor of Administrative Law at the University of Zaragoza.

• D. Luis Alvarez-Ude Cotera, Director General of Green Builing council Spain (GBCe)

• Ms. Claire Roumet, Secretary General of CECODHAS Housing Europe.

• D. Toribio Alfonso Gutiérrez, Dean of the College of Architects of Asturias and adviser responsible for cultural affairs of the Superior Council of Colleges of Architects of Spain.

• Layer D. Severino Ruiz, member of the Standing Committee of AVS and Manager of the Municipal Housing Company of Miranda de Ebro, SA (Viranda) acting as President.

• Ms. Francisca Cabrera Marcet, AVS Manager, Secretary of the Jury.

Excuse attendance D. Luis Cortés Alcalá, Professor of Political Science and Sociology at the Complutense University of Madrid.

It also assists Miguel Contreras D. Manrique, President of AVS.

The list of participants is presented, showing that 14 projects have attended the award for "Best Building in New Work", 3 the award for "Best Performance in the Field of Social and Community Intervention", 10 "Best Performance in the Field of Rehabilitation and Urban Revitalization ", 4" Best Strategy to Facilitate Access to Housing ", 4" Management Effective Park Homes for Rent "and 2 to the" Broadcasting and Revaluation of Performances ".

He remembers as a criterion of procedure to be established, first, a shortlist of the most important projects and then a second study of these candidates will be held to decide who is rewarded and, where appropriate, the runners deemed appropriate bestow.

It then proceeds to study and assessment of candidate projects, depending opting award.

A. AWARD FOR BEST BUILDING IN NEW BUILDING

First attendees see the projects submitted and companies to which they belong, in particular the following:

1. "HOUSING IN SA POBLA". Balear de l'Institut Habitatge (IBAVI)

2. "45 VPO HOUSES IN SANTANDER". Housing and Land Company of Santander, SA

3. "160 PROTECTED HOUSING IN HORTA-GUINARDÓ, BARCELONA". Patronat Municipal de l'Housing of Barcelona.

4. "154 HOUSES FOR RENT, EQUIPMENT AND UNDERGROUND PARKING ON STREET Navas de Tolosa 3". Patronat Municipal de l'Housing of Barcelona.

5. "242 VPO IN SALBURUA, VITORIA". Housing and Land Euskadi, SA (VISESA)

6. "HABITATGES ROC BORONAT". Patronat Municipal de l'Housing of Barcelona.

7. "PROMOTION MAS DURAN III". COMMU Sant Quirze del Vallès.

8. "Promotion GARCÍA GRANA: INTEGRAL RENEWAL OF A POPULAR BARRIADA". Municipal Housing Institute of Malaga.

9. "PROMOTION OF 30 HOUSES FOR RENT IN THE STREET ORFES BANYOLES". Catalan Land Institute (INCASÒL)

10. "69 SUBSIDISED HOUSING REPOSITORY". Habitatges Municipals de Sabadell, SA (VIMUSA)

11. "PLAYING 1 AND 2. 110 + 108 HOUSES BPPV." Municipal Housing and Land in Madrid (SLA)

12. "220 HOUSES OF PROTECTION OFFICER NEW AMATE". Municipal Housing, Land and Facilities of Sevilla, SA (EMVISESA)

13. "245 HOUSES IN THE FUTURE". Municipal Housing, Land and Facilities of Sevilla, SA (EMVISESA)

14. "113 PUBLIC HOUSING IN ARROYOMOLINOS ASFV (MADRID)". Housing Institute of Madrid (IVIMA)

The jury makes the following shortlist of projects. Depending on the number above projects are set at 1, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 and 11.

After further thorough analysis of the shortlisted projects, the jury highlights the following according to the values ??established in the regulations of the Awards. Thereafter, the jury agreed:

First: Grant Award:

"154 HOUSES FOR RENT, EQUIPMENT AND UNDERGROUND PARKING ON STREET Navas de Tolosa 3". Patronat Municipal de l'Housing of Barcelona.

In this performance he disclaims two buildings, energy rating A / B, where their use is highlighted by integrating equipment and social programs such as child care, civic center, laundry facilities, urban garden, as well as the use of homes. A dotacionales building housing for social rent and other housing for seniors.

Also, the jury gives additional value to the fact that this action is part of a global strategy implemented by the Patronat de l'Housing of Barcelona, ??in which sustainability criteria apply to several of his promotions management feature and centralized energy systems and which is carrying out monitoring in order to evaluate facts overall efficiency, replicability and scope.

The adequacy of the design environment, space utilization and adaptation of buildings to the groups to which it is addressed, the use of an air conditioning system that provides singularities both in generation and distribution and the combination is highlighted Therefore the use of prefabricated materials and traditional.

Second: Granting second prize to the following actions:

"69 SUBSIDISED HOUSING REPOSITORY". Habitatges Municipals de Sabadell, SA (VIMUSA)

In this performance, which is the energy rating A / B, the jury highlights the passive solutions such as insulation, cross ventilation ..., incorporation of renewable energy through geothermal, user awareness in housing incorporating a prepayment system and a display for the user to see at any time consumption and can control the temperature and energy expenditure.

Monitoring and telematic control that enables real-time monitoring of consumption. Also the use of materials that reduce water consumption and minimize waste.

"242 VPO IN SALBURUA, VITORIA". Housing and Land Euskadi, SA (VISESA)

The jury highlighted the high level regarding all aspects of sustainable building to have the building almost zero consumption (NZEB) and energy rating A, to incorporate important passive measures and systems for generating high efficiency.

Is enhanced since the competition for the project have been carefully all factors affecting the environment. Thus, the cogeneration system, the use of environmentally certified materials, incorporating waste air, the water separation system, the control noise emissions, discharges, waste management, incorporating energy-efficient appliances, involvement of users in the proper use of facilities and monitoring of consumption. Finally, the excellent cost per m2 built stands.

B. AWARD FOR BEST PERFORMANCE IN THE FIELD OF COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNER

The jury sees the projects presented and businesses to which they belong, in particular the following:

1. "32 HOUSING FOR YOUNG AND OLDER, AND DAY CENTER IN AS PONTES. A Coruña ". Galician Institute of Housing and Land (IGVS)

2. "ACTION IN NEIGHBORHOOD OF AMATE". Municipal Housing, Land and Facilities of Sevilla, SA (EMVISESA)

3. "FRES PLAN: FIGHT AGAINST SOCIAL EXCLUSION YL Inequality". Municipal Housing Institute of Malaga.

After discussion it was agreed to award the prize to:

"32 HOUSING FOR YOUNG AND OLDER, AND DAY CENTER IN AS PONTES. A Coruña ". Galician Institute of Housing and Land (IGVS)

The jury noted that this action is part of an overall strategy for implementation in different cities of Galicia building construction intergenerational housing. Also, intergovernmental co-ordination, European funding, building location and its services for the revitalization of the neighborhood where it was located.

Highlight the incorporation of sustainability criteria in the building, use of reserved contracts with special employment centers, collaboration with companies that have on staff a number of employees with disabilities than 2%, collaboration with nonprofit organizations and collaboration with fair trade organizations.

C. AWARD FOR BEST PERFORMANCE IN THE FIELD OF REHABILITATION AND URBAN REVITALIZATION

The jury sees the projects presented and businesses to which they belong:

1. "16 PROMOTION OF PUBLIC HOUSING AND REHABILITATION IN THE HOUSE PÉREZ PIÑERO CALASPARRA (MURCIA)". Institute for Housing and Land in the Region of Murcia (IVS)

2. "ECOSOCIAL ROAD REHABILITATION OF THE WINDY". Bilbao Municipal Housing OAL.

3. "SETUP OF LIFTS IN BARCELONA (2008-2013)". Barcelona Gestió Urban, SA

4. "SOCIAL INTEGRATION AND NEIGHBORHOOD LIVING TOGETHER FROM THE RENOVATION OF BUILDINGS". Municipal Housing Institute of Malaga.

5. "INTEGRAL REHABILITATION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF SAN MARTIN DE PORRES IN CORDOBA". Housing and Rehabilitation Agency of Andalusia (AVRA)

6. "AREA OF REHABILITATION CITY OF ANGELS". Municipal Housing and Land in Madrid (SLA)

7. "8 PROTECTED AND ENERGY-EFFICIENT HOUSING IN THE DISTRICT OF SAN PEDRO DE VALLADOLID REGALADO". Land and Housing Society Valladolid, SL (VIVA)

8. "SHOW RENEWAL URBAN RESIDENTIAL energetic AEN: FOUR MARCH-VALLADOLID". Land and Housing Society Valladolid, SL (VIVA)

9. "ARI THE REMUDAS". Municipal Housing and Land in the City of Telde (you foster)

10. "REHABILITATION OF REGIONS IN AMATE devastated". Municipal Housing, Land and Facilities of Sevilla, SA (EMVISESA)

The jury's next project screening is performed. Depending on the number previously set projects are the 5, 6 and 9.

After discussion agreed:

First: Grant Award:

The "ARI THE REMUDAS". Municipal Housing and Land in the City of Telde

(You foster)

In this speech the jury emphasizes the integrity of the intervention from redevelopment, improving land use, improvement and expansion of equipment and rehabilitation of housing.

The previous analysis of social assessment of the area for which the intervention is properly adapted to the social reality. The coordination of all levels of government and public-private involving various nonprofit organizations.

Of particular interest has been the cooperation with the locals through a process of open and democratic exchange that incorporated a new website that has allowed residents to issue periodic evaluation reports throughout the whole performance and magnificent result.

Second: Award a Second prize:

"INTEGRAL REHABILITATION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF SAN MARTIN DE PORRES IN CORDOBA". Housing and Rehabilitation Agency of Andalusia (AVRA)

The jury highlights the enormous managerial work done in either set of houses for settlement because they lacked writing new work and horizontal division.

The amplitude of the intervention that includes not only urban but also social which implied a strong inter-governmental collaboration with education, training and employment, sports, health and safety, social services, with special emphasis in the area of ??women transformation. Also citizen participation and public-private partnerships with nonprofit entities.

Also, the consideration of environmental aspects to include these in the technical specifications.

D. AWARD FOR BEST STRATEGY TO FACILITATE ACCESS TO HOUSING

The jury sees the projects presented and businesses to which they belong:

1. "FLATS SHARED HOUSING PROGRAM MUNICIPAL DE BILBAO". Bilbao Municipal Housing OAL.

2. "SPECIAL PAYMENT PLANS: FLEXIBILITY TO THE CURRENT ECONOMIC SITUATION". Municipal Housing Institute of Malaga.

3. "SUPPORTIVE HOUSING NETWORK". Municipal Housing and Land in Madrid (SLA)

4. "ACCOMMODATION TO THE LETTER". Municipal Housing Board of Alicante.

After discussion agrees to grant the Award:

"ACCOMMODATION TO THE LETTER". Municipal Housing Board of Alicante.

The jury will include development of a comprehensive strategic plan to increase the supply of housing for rent and for new forms of tenure through reasonable mechanisms adapted to current circumstances, at an affordable cost and work philosophy based on the motto "always get a bed."

The consistency of a plan that adds various lines of intervention as the rationalization of existing social Park, brokering in all its forms, incorporating new forms of intergenerational housing accommodation, university, shared, supervised and collective accommodation that increase the supply low-cost housing. Also the mortgage mediation program conflicts and leasing support families not to homelessness.

The jury found that the performance meets the conditions of economic sustainability, replicability of the intervention and good solution given in terms of conditions.

E. AWARD FOR MANAGING THE PARK HOMES FOR RENT

The jury sees the projects presented and businesses to which they belong:

1. "+ x -" Houses of the Principality of Asturias, SA (VIPASA).

2. "BILBAO MUNICIPAL SYSTEM FROM THE Evictions". Bilbao Municipal Housing OAL.

3. "BREACH OF CONTRACT MANAGEMENT & SOCIAL COMMITMENT MUNICIPAL HOUSING". Bilbao Municipal Housing OAL.

4. "CONTROL AND MAINTENANCE RIGHT TOOLS FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD LIVING TOGETHER". Municipal Housing Institute of Malaga.

After discussion decided to bestow the award:

"BILBAO MUNICIPAL SYSTEM FROM THE Evictions". Bilbao Municipal Housing OAL.

In this performance, directed at groups in particularly vulnerable situations that are mortgagors or affected by evictions for non-payment of rents, the jury highlighted the organization of a system that addresses this issue in a comprehensive manner. Since the early detection of problem diagnosis to the end of the process with the solution thereof in the event that eviction is effective, with the award of a home for the family concerned.

Believes it is important work to develop a resource guide housing that allows citizens to obtain information, guidance and know the alternatives and the creation of an observatory of social housing that allows the query, obtaining documents and information indicators address the crisis management.

Highlight coordination with other institutions to carry out the whole process, so, with the judicial government, law school, nonprofit institutions, centers borough and private sector.

F. AWARD FOR DISSEMINATION AND VALUE OF PROCEEDINGS

The jury sees the projects presented and businesses to which they belong:

1. "RED HOUSING OFFICE OF BARCELONA". Barcelona Gestió Urban, SA (BAGURSA)

2. "CAMPAIGN TO PROMOTE EFFECTIVE ACCESS TO PROTECTED HOUSING". Municipal Housing Corporation Malaga.

After discussion, the jury found that although both performances are very interesting and valid, the first case is a network of housing offices of citizen services, and the second diffusion is limited to a single housing development that puts value in order that these are purchased or rented, so it is considered that do not conform to that provided in the rules of the Awards that determine what to reward is "the work of the company to spread and enhance the work done by it and the benefits and measurement of social and economic impact it entails. Dissemination through publications, conferences, awards presentation, impact on media ... etc. ".

Therefore the jury believes that this award should be forfeited.

There being no further matters to address the meeting at 17.00 hours rises.